Whoop 5.0
Exact average 79.6 · 3 printed, 6 estimated · printed scores only: 79
Image: WHOOP9 professional reviewers tested the Whoop 5.0, and 5 recommend it. Most praised: battery life and health tracking. Most common complaint: subscription costs.
Reviewed by Garage Gym Reviews, Expert Reviews, TechGearLab and 6 more
The catch: Subscription required, and no display.
6 of these 9 outlets print no score. We estimated theirs from the review text, then adjusted the estimates against the ratings outlets actually print (ours ran slightly low). An estimate is never higher than 92.
Store comparison for this product is coming soon.
What 9 critics said
Highest score first · all converted to 0–100- 85Garage Gym Reviews
Testers name it best for sleep, praising comfort and deep recovery data, while noting weak activity detection, no GPS and a required subscription.
Read Garage Gym Reviews review - 80Expert Reviews
Expert Reviews enjoys the comfortable hardware and tasteful software, but finds exercise heart-rate tracking unreliable and the mandatory subscription poor value next to rivals.
Read Expert Reviews review - 73TechGearLab
Weeks of testing found a minimalist tracker with best-in-class coaching, sleep and recovery analysis and strong battery life.
Read TechGearLab review - 83est.The Independent
Chosen as the best screen-free tracker for its sleep tracking, illness detection and battery life.
Read The Independent review - 83est.The Strategist
Named the best screen-free tracker, praised for recovery and sleep insights.
Read The Strategist review - 79est.The Quantified Scientist
The Whoop 5.0 is a solid, well-rounded health and fitness tracker with an excellent app and sleep tracking capabilities.
Read The Quantified Scientist review - 79est.Marques Brownlee
The Whoop 5.0 is a highly capable and advanced fitness tracker for those who want deep data insights, though its subscription-based model is a significant drawback.
Read Marques Brownlee review - 77est.Macworld
Two months of daily wear left the writer admiring Whoop's strain, recovery and journal concepts and its long battery, but he found its AI coach a poor chatbot.
Read Macworld review - 77est.CNN Underscored
Testers liked its comfort and recovery and strain coaching, though it was only an also-tested entry.
Read CNN Underscored review
"Est." means the outlet printed no score, so we estimated one from its verdict and checked our estimates against ratings outlets print. How we check estimates
Watch a video review
- Marques Brownlee on YouTube ↗Counted in the score: 79
- The Quantified Scientist on YouTube ↗Counted in the score: 79
From YouTube channels we vetted by hand. Videos paid for by the brand are never listed.
What critics praise most
What critics dislike most
Other fitness trackers critics rate highly
Compare head to head
Common questions
Is the Whoop 5.0 worth it?
Critics are divided: 5 of 9 recommend it. Subscription required, and no display.
Do critics agree about the Whoop 5.0?
Critics agree: scores range from 73 (TechGearLab) to 85 (Garage Gym Reviews), a spread of 12 points across 9 reviews. Reviewers broadly agree.
What do critics dislike about the Whoop 5.0?
Subscription costs (8 of 9 reviews).
What is the best alternative to the Whoop 5.0?
The Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro (critic score 91), top pick, narrowly.