Food processors · Best overall

Magimix 4200XL

84
Well liked
Average of 9 professional reviews
8 of 9 recommend it · broad agreement
Where the 9 reviews landedRange 77–92
Score printed by the outlet Estimated from the verdict

Exact average 83.7 · 3 printed, 6 estimated · printed scores only: 84

Magimix 4200XLImage: Magimix

9 professional reviewers tested the Magimix 4200XL, and 8 recommend it. Most praised: cooking results and capacity. Most common complaint: price.

Reviewed by BBC Good Food, Good Housekeeping UK, TechGearLab and 6 more

The catch: It is expensive, heavy and bulky to store.

6 of these 9 outlets print no score. We estimated theirs from the review text, then adjusted the estimates against the ratings outlets actually print (ours ran slightly low). An estimate is never higher than 92.

Check price at Amazon

We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.

What 9 critics said

Highest score first · all converted to 0–100
  1. 85
    BBC Good FoodBuying guide · 2026

    Awarded full marks as the best Magimix: a sturdy, versatile machine with a three-bowl system and many attachments that handles everything from slicing to dough.

    Read BBC Good Food review
  2. 85
    Good Housekeeping UKBuying guide · 2025

    Named runner-up, a smaller and quieter alternative to the 5200XL that did well in grating, slicing and pastry.

    Read Good Housekeeping UK review
  3. 82
    TechGearLabHands-on review · 2024

    A capable second-place processor that excels at mixing, pureeing and cleanup, with uneven chopping and a high price.

    Read TechGearLab review
  4. 92est.
    Tom's GuideNo printed score · Hands-on review

    The reviewer names it the top food processor tested, praising strong power, quiet running and a versatile three-bowl setup.

    Read Tom's Guide review
  5. 83est.
    TechRadarNo printed score · Hands-on review

    A sturdy, versatile all-rounder with good performance and lots of attachments.

    Read TechRadar review
  6. 83est.
    Expert ReviewsNo printed score · Hands-on review · 2016

    A sturdy, quiet and well-equipped processor that gets jobs done quickly and should last for years.

    Read Expert Reviews review
  7. 83est.
    CNETNo printed score · Buying guide · 2025

    Named best large, pro-grade pick in a tested roundup, with restaurant-quality hummus and an intuitive design.

    Read CNET review
  8. 83est.
    MadeForMumsNo printed score · Buying guide · 2024

    Picked as the best for batch cooking, thanks to its large capacity, three bowls and sturdy build.

    Read MadeForMums review
  9. 77est.
    America's Test KitchenNo printed score · Hands-on review · 2026

    Rated only Recommended: handsome and accessory-rich, but it was uneven at several tasks given its price.

    Read America's Test Kitchen review

"Est." means the outlet printed no score, so we estimated one from its verdict and checked our estimates against ratings outlets print. How we check estimates

What critics praise most

Cooking results2 of 9
Capacity2 of 9
Build quality2 of 9

What critics dislike most

Price5 of 9
Size and weight4 of 9
Takes counter space2 of 9

Other food processors critics rate highly

Compare the Magimix 4200XL with another product →

Also reviewed, not yet scored

Common questions

Is the Magimix 4200XL worth it?

Most critics think so: 8 of 9 recommend it. It is expensive, heavy and bulky to store.

Do critics agree about the Magimix 4200XL?

Broad agreement: scores range from 77 (America's Test Kitchen) to 92 (Tom's Guide), a spread of 15 points across 9 reviews. Most reviewers land fairly close together.

What do critics dislike about the Magimix 4200XL?

Price (5 of 9 reviews), Size and weight (4 of 9 reviews), Takes counter space (2 of 9 reviews).

What is the best alternative to the Magimix 4200XL?

The Cuisinart Custom 14-Cup Food Processor (critic score 81), .